INFO-VAX Tue, 01 Apr 2008 Volume 2008 : Issue 184 Contents: Re: Alphaserver/station reliability Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Getting Tomcat to allow upper-case application names? Re: Getting Tomcat to allow upper-case application names? Re: Getting Tomcat to allow upper-case application names? Re: Send your questions to Paul Otelini Re: System Programming Resources for Alpha Architecture ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:54:20 -0400 From: "David Turner, Island Computers" Subject: Re: Alphaserver/station reliability Message-ID: FYI We are a reseller that is able to provide HP authorized systems and HP authorized licenses. Let me know if you would like a quote for this product With the current exchange rate it is very beneficial to foreign companies to purchase in US Dollars Regards -- David B Turner ============================================= Island Computers US Corp PO Box 86 Tybee GA 31328 Toll Free: 1-877 636 4332 x201, Mobile x251 Email: dturner@islandco.com International: 001 706 993 1787 Fax: 912 786 8505 Web: www.islandco.com ============================================= wrote in message news:9e34ca46-b248-4099-b4ce-30d5e5959c09@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > This is a little bit of an open request but for the installation and > application I'm trying to justify it would really help me if I could > get some 'real' uptime data from the wider industry on how reliable > AlphaServers are. I know they have outstanding performance and are > used by half of wall street etc. but it would be great to know from > the real guys who have to keep these things running the real facts > behind the claims. > The two models I'm interested in are Alphaserver DS25 (a number of, > both single and dual processor) and an Alphastation DS15. All will be > running Tru64 Unix 5.1b. > Simple feedback such as "Typical application, date installed, MTBF/ > uptime/failure rate etc., whether frequently power-cycled or running > 24/7" would be great. Direct contact details to confirm this would > also be appreciated but not essential. > The reason for this request is to support the use of the Alphas in a > mission-critical role running a legacy app as part of the business > justification. > Posting to the forum preferred but mail to hp@pearson.in also accepted > if confidentiality required. ------------------------------ Date: 01 Apr 2008 11:53:07 GMT From: VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: <47f22222$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net> In article , BobH writes: >VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in >news:47f16c09$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: > >> In article <47f15559$0$3857$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei >> writes: >>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: >>> >>>> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light >>>> pollution, it was a gesture about conserving energy. Power >>>> companies generate electric based on average demands. I really >>>> doubt that they made any fuel consumption changes based on a minor >>>> brief hour dip on the grid. >>> >>>Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed an >>>8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. >> >> Could be but the generators were still turning! > >They may well be spinning, but the amount of energy they use is >proportional to the amount of power they are outputting. The wheels on a >car may turn at the same speed down hill and uphill, but downhill the >engine may be near idle, while uphill it is consuming gasoline at a much >greater rate, even theough it is turning, along with the wheels, at the >same speed. Gas turbines aren't enormously efficient! 60% at most. A 7% dip in the grid for an hour didn't affect anything significantly! -- VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?" http://tmesis.com/drat.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:01:35 -0700 (PDT) From: AEF Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: On Apr 1, 7:53 am, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > In article , BobH writes: > >VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in > >news:47f16c09$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: > > >> In article <47f15559$0$3857$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei > >> writes: > >>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > > >>>> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light > >>>> pollution, it was a gesture about conserving energy. Power > >>>> companies generate electric based on average demands. I really > >>>> doubt that they made any fuel consumption changes based on a minor > >>>> brief hour dip on the grid. > > >>>Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed an > >>>8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. > > >> Could be but the generators were still turning! > > >They may well be spinning, but the amount of energy they use is > >proportional to the amount of power they are outputting. The wheels on a > >car may turn at the same speed down hill and uphill, but downhill the > >engine may be near idle, while uphill it is consuming gasoline at a much > >greater rate, even theough it is turning, along with the wheels, at the > >same speed. > > Gas turbines aren't enormously efficient! 60% at most. A 7% dip in the > grid for an hour didn't affect anything significantly! > > -- > VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM > 60%?! That's amazingly good for heat --> electricity. I thought the practical limit was around 40%, though I vaguely remember reading about some "super" stuff perhaps getting that high. Still quite an achievement. AEF ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:10:49 -0700 (PDT) From: AEF Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: On Apr 1, 7:53 am, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > In article , BobH writes: > >VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in > >news:47f16c09$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: > > >> In article <47f15559$0$3857$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei > >> writes: > >>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > > >>>> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light > >>>> pollution, it was a gesture about conserving energy. Power > >>>> companies generate electric based on average demands. I really > >>>> doubt that they made any fuel consumption changes based on a minor > >>>> brief hour dip on the grid. > > >>>Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed an > >>>8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. > > >> Could be but the generators were still turning! > > >They may well be spinning, but the amount of energy they use is > >proportional to the amount of power they are outputting. The wheels on a > >car may turn at the same speed down hill and uphill, but downhill the > >engine may be near idle, while uphill it is consuming gasoline at a much > >greater rate, even theough it is turning, along with the wheels, at the > >same speed. > > Gas turbines aren't enormously efficient! 60% at most. A 7% dip in the > grid for an hour didn't affect anything significantly! > > -- > VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_engine for typical heat-engine efficiencies. Remember the 3 laws of thermodynamics: 1. You can't win. 2. You can't even break even. 3. You gotta play the game. AEF ------------------------------ Date: 01 Apr 2008 14:42:19 GMT From: VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: <47f249ca$0$5617$607ed4bc@cv.net> In article , AEF writes: >On Apr 1, 7:53 am, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: >> In article , BobH writes: >> >VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in >> >news:47f16c09$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: >> >> >> In article <47f15559$0$3857$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei >> >> writes: >> >>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: >> >> >>>> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light >> >>>> pollution, it was a gesture about conserving energy. Power >> >>>> companies generate electric based on average demands. I really >> >>>> doubt that they made any fuel consumption changes based on a minor >> >>>> brief hour dip on the grid. >> >> >>>Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed an >> >>>8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. >> >> >> Could be but the generators were still turning! >> >> >They may well be spinning, but the amount of energy they use is >> >proportional to the amount of power they are outputting. The wheels on a >> >car may turn at the same speed down hill and uphill, but downhill the >> >engine may be near idle, while uphill it is consuming gasoline at a much >> >greater rate, even theough it is turning, along with the wheels, at the >> >same speed. >> >> Gas turbines aren't enormously efficient! 60% at most. A 7% dip in the >> grid for an hour didn't affect anything significantly! >> >> -- >> VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM >> > >See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_engine for typical heat-engine >efficiencies. Then why didn't you consult wiki's gas turbine efficiency reference? >Remember the 3 laws of thermodynamics: > >1. You can't win. > >2. You can't even break even. > >3. You gotta play the game. Wow. I'm going to have to toss my Sears and Salinger "Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory, and Statistical Thermodynamics" in the fire as they've mislead me on these laws. dU=dQ-dw ... hogwash! dS=dQ/T .... doggerel! lim S=0 .... utter bullshit! T->0 If I should cross paths with Dr. Smith, I'll personally thank him for wasting several hours a week for two semesters which would have been better spent in the pub contemplating the adiabatic boundary keeping heat flow (q) from my favorite beverages. :) -- VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?" http://tmesis.com/drat.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT) From: DaveG Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: <8909a12e-ba6c-4d0a-865b-d5924edf9707@y24g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> On Mar 31, 5:37=A0pm, Fred Bach wrote: > JF Mezei wrote: > > VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > > >> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light pollu= tion, > >> it was a gesture about conserving energy. =A0Power companies generate e= lectric > >> based on average demands. =A0I really doubt that they made any fuel con= sumption > >> changes based on a minor brief hour dip on the grid. > > > Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed an > > 8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. > > =A0 =A0I heard on the radio it was about 7% out here Vancouver way. > > =A0 . fred . Chicago reported a 7% drop. Its an awareness thing, and the more that are made aware, the better. I think. Similar to when recycling was introduced some years ago. Many recycle now by default. Didn't before. Perhaps the same will happen (eventually) with shutting off a light here and there. Its a start. Dave... ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:10:11 -0700 (PDT) From: tadamsmar Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: On Mar 31, 12:09=A0pm, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > In article <1ea8e2fb-040d-4f8f-ad2f-40a84aabd...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.= com>, AEF writes: > > > > > > >On Mar 30, 7:46 am, VAXman- =A0@SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: > >> In article , hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (P= hillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply) writes: > > >> >In article <47ef152b$0$23915$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei > >> > writes: > > >> >> Figured I would shut down one of my alphas for EARTH-HOUR . > > >> >What is EARTH-HOUR? > > >> Just a way to make people concerned about the environment feel good abo= ut > >> themselves and nothing more. > > >>http://www.earthhour.org/ > > >> -- > >> VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker =A0 VAXman(at)TMESIS(d= ot)COM > > >> =A0 "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?" > > >>http://tmesis.com/drat.html > > >Anything that makes the sky darker, even for only an hour, and/or has > >the net result of improving lighthing by increasing efficiency (esp. > >by decreasing wasted light that goes up into the sky, helping no one), > >and reducing glare (which actually INCREASES nighttime visibility > >making a safer and more pleasant nighttime environment), is fine by > >me. Bravo! > > >Seehttp://www.darksky.org/ > > 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light pollutio= n, > it was a gesture about conserving energy. =A0Power companies generate elec= tric > based on average demands. =A0I really doubt that they made any fuel consum= ption > changes based on a minor brief hour dip on the grid. I worked on power generation control (on VAX VMS). They most certainly do not generate based on average demand. They are constantly changing output to balance generation and demand. They keep nuclear plant output constant for safety reasons. They use other types of generators to vary demand. Hydro/pump storage/load control is the easiest to vary. But I think they could have varied gas or coal fired plant for a 1 hour drop in demand - not sure. > > -- > VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker =A0 VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)= COM > > =A0 "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?" > > http://tmesis.com/drat.html- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:20:40 GMT From: BobH Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in news:47f22222$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: > In article , BobH writes: >>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in >>news:47f16c09$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: >> >>> In article <47f15559$0$3857$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei >>> writes: >>>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: >>>> >>>>> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light >>>>> pollution, it was a gesture about conserving energy. Power >>>>> companies generate electric based on average demands. I really >>>>> doubt that they made any fuel consumption changes based on a minor >>>>> brief hour dip on the grid. >>>> >>>>Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed >>>>an 8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. >>> >>> Could be but the generators were still turning! >> >>They may well be spinning, but the amount of energy they use is >>proportional to the amount of power they are outputting. The wheels >>on a car may turn at the same speed down hill and uphill, but downhill >>the engine may be near idle, while uphill it is consuming gasoline at >>a much greater rate, even theough it is turning, along with the >>wheels, at the same speed. > > Gas turbines aren't enormously efficient! 60% at most. A 7% dip in > the grid for an hour didn't affect anything significantly! My point of course is to contridict the notion that reducing output did not conserver energy. If the gas turbines delivered 7% less energy then to a first order approximation they consumed 7% less fuel, contrary to an earlier assertion. The argument that a 7% reduction for an hour or whatever the numbers are is too small to make any real difference is a seperate question. Any reduction in electrical power used will reflect in a reduction in fuel used and most likely carbon emmissions, and it will be in rough proportion. I say that because: hydro will eventually use all the water behind the dams. If you reflect the reduced demand in reduced hydo output you will have more left later to reduce the need to burn fuel. Eventually you save fuel no matter when you use the water. In the case of wind, solar and the like you either use it or lose it. Might as well use all you can since reducing production does not save or conserve anything. You still have to pay the same on your costs (the investment in the generation resources). The non-fuel based generation options are basically fixed cost inverstments regardless of how much of their capacity you use, so the best bet in the case of a demand reduction seems to be to continue full production from them and absorb the reduced demand with reductions in burning fuel. ------------------------------ Date: 01 Apr 2008 16:48:24 GMT From: VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG Subject: Re: Does POWER_OFF really work ? Message-ID: <47f26757$0$5606$607ed4bc@cv.net> In article , BobH writes: >VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in >news:47f22222$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: > >> In article , BobH writes: >>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote in >>>news:47f16c09$0$5615$607ed4bc@cv.net: >>> >>>> In article <47f15559$0$3857$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei >>>> writes: >>>>>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'Twould be fine with me too but the power-hour wasn't about light >>>>>> pollution, it was a gesture about conserving energy. Power >>>>>> companies generate electric based on average demands. I really >>>>>> doubt that they made any fuel consumption changes based on a minor >>>>>> brief hour dip on the grid. >>>>> >>>>>Not sure how authoritative, but I heard the city of Toronto noticed >>>>>an 8% drop in electrical consumption during that hour. >>>> >>>> Could be but the generators were still turning! >>> >>>They may well be spinning, but the amount of energy they use is >>>proportional to the amount of power they are outputting. The wheels >>>on a car may turn at the same speed down hill and uphill, but downhill >>>the engine may be near idle, while uphill it is consuming gasoline at >>>a much greater rate, even theough it is turning, along with the >>>wheels, at the same speed. >> >> Gas turbines aren't enormously efficient! 60% at most. A 7% dip in >> the grid for an hour didn't affect anything significantly! > >My point of course is to contridict the notion that reducing output did >not conserver energy. If the gas turbines delivered 7% less energy then >to a first order approximation they consumed 7% less fuel, contrary to an >earlier assertion. Therefore, if I turn off all of the electric appliances in my home when my gas generator is running, it will run forever. That's cool! I suppose all of those Hummers queued up on the NJ roadways every morning heading into NYC where their occupants will consume more energy are saving gas by not moving. ... and, perhaps, average was not the best term to use. The power companies are aware of their demands. Average := some 'X' level of demand. -- VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?" http://tmesis.com/drat.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:22:52 GMT From: winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing) Subject: Getting Tomcat to allow upper-case application names? Message-ID: <00A77727.C0196CB8@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> OpenVMS 8.3 on rx2600. Java 1.5.0 Tomcat 5.5.9 We brought this URAWI application over from Unix. URLs look like /URAWI/Login.html ODS-5 disk. A directory of webapps looks like: Directory APACHE$COMMON:[APACHE.JAKARTA.TOMCAT.webapps] balancer.DIR;1 countries.DIR;1 countries.war;1 jpetstore.DIR;1 jpetstore.war;1 myapp-0^.1-dev.DIR;1 myapp-0^.1-dev.war;1 ROOT.DIR;1 servlets-examples.DIR;1 SPRING-FRAMEWORK-1_2_9.DIR;1 SPRING1.ZIP;1 SPRINGFRAMEWORK.DIR;1 tomcat-docs.DIR;1 TRIAL-EXAMPLES.DIR;1 URAWI.DIR;1 webdav.DIR;1 $type apache$specific:[000000].tomcatrc $ SET PROCESS /PARSE_STYLE=EXTENDED $ DEFINE/JOB APACHE$JAKARTA_ENABLE_ODS5 "1" $ DEFINE/JOB APACHE$JAKARTA_USE_FASTVM "1" $ DEFINE/JOB APACHE$JAKARTA_JAVA_PARAMETERS_FILE APACHE$ROOT:[000000]TOMCAT_JVM_ARGS.DAT $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$EFS_CHARSET "ENABLE" $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$ARGV_PARSE_STYLE "ENABLE" $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$FILE_SHARING "ENABLE" $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$CACHING_INTERVAL "60" $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$CACHING_DIRECTORY "TRUE" $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS "0" $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$READDIR_CASE_DISABLE "TRUE" $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$DAEMONIZE_MAIN_THREAD "TRUE" $ $ DEFINE APACHE$JAKARTA_JDK_SETUP SYS$MANAGER:JAVA$150_SETUP.COM ----- The manager application shows the URAWI application as /urawi "/urawi/Login.html" works. "/URAWI/Login.html" produces the 404 page from Tomcat. How can I get "/URAWI/" to be recognized? I would have thought the various DECC$ logicals, the JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS, etc, etc, would have done it, but apparently not. JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS "8" and "-1" don'tmake any visible difference either. Thanks for any info. -- Alan ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:29:23 -0500 (CDT) From: sms@antinode.org (Steven M. Schweda) Subject: Re: Getting Tomcat to allow upper-case application names? Message-ID: <08040108292337_2020CE0A@antinode.org> From: winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing) > $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$EFS_CHARSET "ENABLE" > $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$ARGV_PARSE_STYLE "ENABLE" > How can I get "/URAWI/" to be recognized? I would have thought the various > DECC$ logicals, the JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS, etc, etc, would have done it, but > apparently not. No bets, but I normally set "DECC$EFS_CASE_PRESERVE" along with those other two. I'd need to review the C RTL document to remember exactly why, but it sounds plausible, and it seemed like a good idea at the time. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-org 382 South Warwick Street (+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:43:19 -0700 (PDT) From: AEF Subject: Re: Getting Tomcat to allow upper-case application names? Message-ID: <7be81c6b-d7b9-41bf-9b83-088abf362e68@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> On Apr 1, 6:22 am, wins...@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing) wrote: > OpenVMS 8.3 on rx2600. > Java 1.5.0 > Tomcat 5.5.9 > > We brought this URAWI application over from Unix. URLs look like > /URAWI/Login.html > > ODS-5 disk. > > A directory of webapps looks like: > > Directory APACHE$COMMON:[APACHE.JAKARTA.TOMCAT.webapps] > > balancer.DIR;1 countries.DIR;1 countries.war;1 jpetstore.DIR;1 > jpetstore.war;1 myapp-0^.1-dev.DIR;1 > myapp-0^.1-dev.war;1 ROOT.DIR;1 > servlets-examples.DIR;1 SPRING-FRAMEWORK-1_2_9.DIR;1 > SPRING1.ZIP;1 SPRINGFRAMEWORK.DIR;1 tomcat-docs.DIR;1 > TRIAL-EXAMPLES.DIR;1 URAWI.DIR;1 webdav.DIR;1 > > $type apache$specific:[000000].tomcatrc > $ SET PROCESS /PARSE_STYLE=EXTENDED > $ DEFINE/JOB APACHE$JAKARTA_ENABLE_ODS5 "1" > $ DEFINE/JOB APACHE$JAKARTA_USE_FASTVM "1" > $ DEFINE/JOB APACHE$JAKARTA_JAVA_PARAMETERS_FILE > APACHE$ROOT:[000000]TOMCAT_JVM_ARGS.DAT > $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$EFS_CHARSET "ENABLE" > $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$ARGV_PARSE_STYLE "ENABLE" > $ DEFINE/JOB DECC$FILE_SHARING "ENABLE" > $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$CACHING_INTERVAL "60" > $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$CACHING_DIRECTORY "TRUE" > $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS "0" > $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$READDIR_CASE_DISABLE "TRUE" > $ DEFINE/JOB JAVA$DAEMONIZE_MAIN_THREAD "TRUE" > $ > $ DEFINE APACHE$JAKARTA_JDK_SETUP SYS$MANAGER:JAVA$150_SETUP.COM > ----- > > The manager application shows the URAWI application as /urawi > > "/urawi/Login.html" works. > > "/URAWI/Login.html" produces the 404 page from Tomcat. > > How can I get "/URAWI/" to be recognized? I would have thought the various > DECC$ logicals, the JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS, etc, etc, would have done it, but > apparently not. > > JAVA$FILENAME_CONTROLS "8" and "-1" don'tmake any visible difference either. > > Thanks for any info. > > -- Alan I can't believe there is software like this. WHY ON EARTH would someone need it to be NOT case-sensitive? AEF ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:58:57 -0700 From: "Tom Linden" Subject: Re: Send your questions to Paul Otelini Message-ID: On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:31:53 -0700, JF Mezei wrote: > The BBC is organising an "Have your say" event with Intel's Paul > Otellini this coming friday. > > You can submit your questions at: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7322205.stm > > If BBC deems the question to be important, it will send them to Intel > for an answer. The site indicates that it posts responses that it deems worthy on the site. I could not find any responses. > > The more people send question about IA64's future, the more chances one > of them will be sent to Otellini for answer. -- PL/I for OpenVMS www.kednos.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 04:29:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Keith Cayemberg Subject: Re: System Programming Resources for Alpha Architecture Message-ID: On Mar 27, 11:08 pm, "John Wallace" wrote: > These things define the architecture. Then there are various generations of > CPU chips which implement the architecture, and various generations of > support chips which connect the CPU chips to the outside world (PCI and the > like). The chips usually come with their own documentation, which might or > might not be of interest depending on your plans. Documentation for chips > used to live at http://ftp.digital.com/pub/Digital/info/semiconductor/literature/ but I > think that's gone (it's not there right now), and I don't know of any > official replacements which still work (there were some, they're gone too). Try the Wayback Machine... http://web.archive.org/web/20070317053600/http://ftp.digital.com/pub/Digital/info/semiconductor/literature/ Cheers! Keith ------------------------------ End of INFO-VAX 2008.184 ************************